首页> 外文OA文献 >The expansion of English-medium instruction in the Nordic countries : Can top-down university language policies encourage bottom-up disciplinary literacy goals?
【2h】

The expansion of English-medium instruction in the Nordic countries : Can top-down university language policies encourage bottom-up disciplinary literacy goals?

机译:北欧国家英语教学的扩展:自上而下的大学语言政策能否鼓励自下而上的学科扫盲目标?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recently, in the wake of the Bologna Declaration and similar international initiatives, there has been a rapid increase in the number of university courses and programmes taught through the medium of English. Surveys have consistently shown the Nordic countries to be at the forefront of this trend towards English-medium instruction (EMI). In this paper, we discuss the introduction of EMI in four Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden). We present the educational setting and the EMI debate in each of these countries and summarize relevant research findings. We then make some tentative suggestions for the introduction of EMI in higher education in other countries. In particular, we are interested in university language policies and their relevance for the day-to-day work of faculty. We problematize one-size-fits-all university language policies, suggesting that in order for policies to be seen as relevant they need to be flexible enough to take into account disciplinary differences. In this respect, we make some specific suggestions about the content of university language policies and EMI course syllabuses. Here we recommend that university language policies should encourage the discussion of disciplinary literacy goals and require course syllabuses to detail disciplinary-specific language-learning outcomes.
机译:最近,随着《博洛尼亚宣言》和类似的国际倡议的出现,通过英语进行的大学课程和计划的数量迅速增加。调查始终表明,北欧国家处于这种朝着英语中等教学(EMI)趋势发展的最前沿。在本文中,我们讨论了在四个北欧国家(丹麦,芬兰,挪威和瑞典)中引入EMI的问题。我们介绍了这些国家/地区的教育背景和EMI辩论,并总结了相关研究结果。然后,我们就在其他国家的高等教育中引入EMI提出一些初步建议。我们尤其对大学语言政策及其与教师日常工作的相关性感兴趣。我们对一种适合所有人的大学语言政策提出了质疑,建议为了使政策被视为相关政策,它们必须足够灵活以考虑学科差异。在这方面,我们对大学语言政策和EMI课程大纲的内容提出了一些具体建议。在这里,我们建议大学语言政策应鼓励对学科扫盲目标的讨论,并要求课程提纲详细说明特定学科的语言学习成果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号